🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a industry expert? Are hordes of respondents praising your advice on expanding your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss collaborations?

Should that not be the case, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Gender Identity for Better Visibility

Numerous women joined a collective professional network test recently after viral posts suggested that switching their profile gender to "man" enhanced their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their profiles to incorporate what they called "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has caused some to wonder whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who employ online business jargon.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs an algorithm to determine which content are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the phenomenon but claimed it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when deciding post visibility. Instead, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your posts appears in search or feed.

Individual Results

Simone Bonnett, who modified her pronouns to "he/him" and her name to "a masculine version", described remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Method

• First, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rewrite her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she repurposed previous content with comparable "assertive" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and confident - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after seven days, saying "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some participants experienced positive results. Cass Cooper who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" reported a decrease in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These experiments coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in recent months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in informal experiments where identical posts by male and female users received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and distribute posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in some users' reach might stem from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester observed, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the network.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more businesslike and polished," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly competitive and less controlled."