🔗 Share this article

The count of reserved positions for Māori representatives on NZ councils is set to be cut by more than half, after a controversial legislative amendment that forced municipal councils to put the future of hard-earned Māori seats to a public vote.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have multiple elected officials depending on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments could only create a Indigenous seat by initially putting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities often devoted considerable time building community backing and pushing their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To address this concern, the former administration allowed local councils to set up a Indigenous seat without first requiring them to subject it to a popular ballot.

However, this year, the right-wing coalition government overturned the policy, saying communities ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The new legislation mandated councils that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the local body elections, which ended on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their seats, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes represented “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has ushered in extensive reversals to policies intended to improve Māori health, wellbeing and representation. The government has said it aims to terminate “race-based” approaches, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Māori and every citizen.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – most urban centers required to vote supported Māori wards, while rural regions leaned strongly towards disestablishing them.

“It's unfortunate for the Māori wards that had recently been established – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of eligible voters participating, prompting demands for reform.

The process had been “a mockery”.

Differential Standards

Councils are permitted to establish different wards – such as rural wards – without initially mandating a community ballot. The disparate requirements applied to Indigenous representation indicated the government was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Well, they failed. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark concerned the 17 areas that chose to keep their seats.